Wait, are they really implying that porn incites violence? Because I’m not entirely convinced that it does… then again, I don’t know if I’m entirely convinced that it doesn’t. 

All I know is that porn does serve a useful outlet for our sexual urges, but then again, the question is also what type of porn. Pornography comes in different forms, and we shouldn’t make the mistake of generalizing the effects of each type… obviously something like child porn is wrong, and stuff that portray sexualized violence against both men and women shouldn’t be encouraged, but what about stuff like erotica or (fan) smut? Are such forms even considered porn per se?

That’s what I don’t like about that particular crime prevention ad… when they said, “don’t look at porn”, it leaves so many unanswered questions… hence, well, more sexually frustrated individuals, which I believe would lead to sexual violence. 

(Starts at the 1:40 mark. What does everyone else think? This topic’s still highly debated, and a lot of the sentiment fuels from personal values rather than facts. Moreover, let’s not forget that correlation does NOT equal causation.)

(Also, I think we need to be sure we’re interpreting the video correctly… we all know how things get lost in translation, and like 20% of the subs are not even there -_- (so if there’s anyone out there fluent in Korean and is willing to verify/clarify, that would be awesome!))

The rest of these crime prevention ads are quite interesting… here’s part 2 for anyone else who is interested: