K-pop, society, and everything in between.

Petition for Infinite and Woollim Entertainment to cancel concert screenings and plans for release of "Inconvenient Truth": an awareness campaign for misogyny and rape culture

About AKF
Recommended blogs


Academic articles on K-pop & the Hallyu
"AKF in Korea" series
사생 (sasaeng) fans series
The Block B files

Celebrity sightings, fan meets and the epistemology of K-pop idols: What do we know and how do we know?
K-pop fan-fiction: Thoughts by readers and writers

Blud Bruthaz

"You can thank Google for your new obsession" (CNN Geek Out)
"When fans go too far" (CNN Geek Out)

K-pop fanart & fanfiction
Block B and media misrepresentation
Being branded as a 'K-pop fan'
Regulation & the KMRB's new policy
Fan behavior and decorum
"Plus size" in Korea
SNL Korea does blackface
Politics and Korean hiphop
Don't want to get AIDS? Masturbate!
"Skinny Baby" NOT hot
"Unwed mothers are ignorant whores"?
Shipping, fanfictions, and smut
"Getting an Abortion in South Korea"
South Korea's education system
Tablo, TaJinYo, and the implications of celebrity obsession
Jay Park, JYJ, and other issues that make you think twice about being a K-pop consumer
Block B and cultural silencing
Beauty standards and how idols propagate them
The multiple ventures of an idol
Korean indie vs. K-pop
Block B's comeback in a post-controversy framework
Idols tweeting about private matters
▪ The mentality of idol hopefuls [1] [2]
▪ Jay Park and being 'gangsta' in K-pop [1] [2] [3]
▪ Pursuing idoldom: AKF's advice [1] [2]
Shipping idols of the same sex
The role of visuals in K-pop
Can non-Asians make it in K-pop?
BEAST's 'racist' New York casting call?
Cultural insensitivity plagues K-pop
▪ English in K-pop songs [1] [2]
How 'Asian' are the MAMAs?
Thoughts on fan service
Plastic surgery: achieving 'natural' via unnatural means?
"National prestige" and the Hallyu Wave
Government takes action for sexual exploitation in K-pop?
Cracking down hagwons & education reform
The irony of the 'ethnic diversity' gimmick
BEAST & 4-Minute tells us not to watch porn?
The "Paradox of Korean Globalization" and K-pop
Japanese actor Sousuke Takaoka's "xenophobia" towards Hallyu?
Songs by BEAST, Jay Park, etc. banned
The "plight" of KoreAm idols?
Dalmatian's Daniel imitating accents: funny or "racist"?
What exactly makes K-pop "K-pop"?
Why "K-pop Secrets" sorta piss me off


▪ angrykpopfan@gmail.com

visitors by country counter

The name and the concept was inspired by Angry Asian Man and The Angry Black Woman. In my posts, I cite my sources accordingly. All images I include are not mine. None of the gifs are mine. Nope, not even that green fan. Credits go to their original owners. Someone please make me a less artistically-deficient banner.

Creative Commons License
Angry K-pop Fan's literary work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

(Venting since March 2011)
Recent Tweets @angrykpopfan
Posts tagged "jyp"

Entertainment agencies KeyEast, SM, YG, JYP, AMENT, and Star J has joined forces and created an investment corporate body known as United Asia Management as a step closer to achieving a more international status for k-entertainment.

The CEO of KeyEast stated, 

"Using the experience each company has in advancing overseas, we will be bringing together each company’s business know-hows and network systems as the base for our new agency. We are looking forward to this collaboration in creating a synergistic effect for the advancement of not only Korea’s entertainment industry, but Asia as well."

According to Allkpop,

all artists under the six agencies will be under a database system that manages intellectual property rights. A new contents production system will be utilized as well for movies, dramas, and other media. UAM will also be acting as the global agency for artists planning to advance, or currently promoting in, overseas.

Ok, so I seriously know nothing about business and the like, but according to what I’ve read so far, intellectual property are creative inventions of the human mind (such as art, poetry, music, etc.), making intellectual property rights those that protect the interests of creators by giving them property rights over their creations. From this, I’m assuming one of the following:

  •  a) that the works created by the artists and the producers that will be created under the UAM’s name will be that of UAM, and not of the individual companies, or
  • b) the works created will still be under each individual companies’ names, just recorded within the larger database of UAM.

(Then again, there’s a huge 97% chance I’m wrong, so please correct me if you can. Seriously, I’m making huge guesses here.)  

ANYWAYS, UAM will be housing the following entertainers and more: Jang Dong Gun, Hyun Bin, Shin Min Ah, Bae Yong Joon, Kim Hyun Joong, BoA, Lee Yeon Hee, Goo Hye Sun, Big Bang, Rain, 2PM, Miss A, and the Wonder Girls.

Oh, and a comment that may fill up some holes:

Company YG, SM and JYP sell music in Korea. They all want to sell their music in Japan but to do that they have to use a middleman, (let us say for random’s sake) AVEX. However, AVEX only sells their music if he can have 50% of their sales in Japan. So YG, SM and JYP decided to pool their money together and start UAM. UAM is owned partially by all of them so they get more of their money back allowing them to expand into America and Europe. But, in Korea, Japan, America, and Europe company YG, SM and JYP all remain separate entities. (toplover13)

Besides the corporate aspect of this issue, it seems that the industry is seriously making itself aware and pro-active in the globalization of the k-entertainment industry. As pumped as I am (our access to k-pop as international fans is growing!!), some comments of the article highlighting the possible pitfalls of this caught my eye:

  • Many fans seemed to be concerned about the fates of smaller companies (such as Cube (4Minute, G.Na, BEAST).

This is a legit concern, come to think of it. Competition is no longer competition — it’s purely domination. What will happen to smaller companies’ plans to promote their artists overseas?

  • Many are questioning the donning of the term “Asialyu” in replacement of “Hallyu,” as stated in the article. 

People are getting technical — there is debate that if all these companies are purely South Korean companies, then it’s nothing more than just a power up for “Hallyu”. The ‘domination of Asia’ that is implied through the term “Asialyu” is not at all existent if this is the case. (Also, wtf is up with a fail word like “Asialyu”)

Another pretty interesting point was brought up by a particular commentator:

What’s really interesting is what will happen to …say the Japan market. Currently SM contracts LOADS with AVEX…and in turn AVEX acts as SM’s strong-arm to get their artists airplay/TV time, or in the case of JYJ, to completely block them from public activities all together. Soooo ~~~ when this UAM cuts out AVEX (and AVEX’s $$$ take from Korean artists) what do you think will happen within the Japanese Management Companies? I’m gonna bet Korean artists will no longer be as welcome to the Oricon charts as they once were. (sally_b)

On the other hand, fans are spazzing over it, claiming that: 

  • the cohesion of groups under a single label (somewhat) may lessen fan wars and tension between fan clubs (THANK GOD)
  • more exposure for k-entertainment on a global scale
  • a more direct approach is taken in the direction towards overseas promotions (no longer is it a wishy-washy sort of project — an establishment like this consolidates commitment towards the effort)

in addition, my two cents:

  • establishing themselves in a more global scale places these companies under a bigger watchdog, which may decrease the potential for any corruptive corporate activities and misdemeanors, a huge plus for the entertainers on board. 

It’s quite a complicated issue, nevertheless something that we all need to keep tabs on. What does everyone else think?

(image credit: Allkpop)

This one KBS show recently did a special feature about idol trainee auditions, and what the real deal is behind closed doors.

One trainee was found stating, “Even I knew that I wasn’t able to show off my full potential during my condition, but they gave me a positive review. But after I passed the audition, they demanded that I pay $2,700 USD.”

The trainee was also asked to call the director of her agency without alerting him that he was being recorded. When asked about the contract fee she was forced to pay, he replied, “There are no agencies these days that support you financially 100%. Since we do support you 100%, don’t leave us. Even if you say that we forced you to provide sexual favors, you really have nothing to say in the end.”

Another trainee hoping to become an actress later gave her own account, revealing, “The agency said they were looking for a small role and wanted to meet me in person. They instead dragged me to their home and force fed me various drinks, claiming that they needed to check my limit. After a while, they taped my mouth shut so that I couldn’t scream, and further claimed that in order to become a celebrity, I needed to have sex with him.”

What was even more shocking for viewers was that this all happened before she entered her third year of junior high school. (credit: allkpop)

This isn’t at all surprising, but it’s nevertheless disturbing. Issues like this keep coming up again and again, and I continue to wonder if anything is even being done about this. 

The comments of this particular article brings to light a few good points. 

Everyone’s saying only small sketchy companies would do such a thing, but in reality it’s the big companies that have the power. If someone said she was abused by the CEO of a huge company, do you think anyone would believe her? They’d say “no, you’re just bitter about being rejected”. Just look at the replies on this article, no one wants to believe their favorite companies are anything but beautiful and loving
Everyone’s not saying that only the small sketchy companies would do this, and yeah, the big companies have power. Most are saying that smaller companies would do this because they’re mostly unknown companies, therefore it would be easier for them to get away with it. I, for one, think it’s unlikely something like this would happen in SME because of the age that SM takes in trainees, same for YGE, and JYPE. Also, the way the auditions are conducted in all three companies. SME, JYPE, and YGE aren’t the only big companies, but they are the three major companies in SK at the moment. We just think it’s unlikely they’d do something like that. I’m not saying a trainee hasn’t been subjected to that kind of treatment before and that it won’t happen in the future.

Watchdogs need to delve deeper into this issue, especially into the cases of the more popular agencies. It would be naive to say that the bigger names are completely immune from scandals like this, and I’m quite certain even today’s popular idols have gone through situations like this. 

There’s another comment I kinda wanna address: 

It’s sad that this happens almost everywhere. Here’s something that E.H.P posted in a forum topic, and it’s something I agree with about the Big 3:

“Okay, so if you’re from the U.S., I’m sure you’ve heard of the phrase “casting couch”? Well if you haven’t, it means trading sexual favors for a career advancement. This is prevalent in Hollywood. Gwyneth Paltrow and Lisa Rinna have spoken about the Hollywood tradition of sex-for-roles. A lot of other celebrities have mentioned it in their memoirs or interviews. It happens ALL the time. 

BUT does that mean you can automatically assume that happens in DISNEY auditions?? No, you can’t. When people who don’t really know Korea make the assumption that SNSD must have had sex for their careers, to me, it’s the same thing as non-Americans making the assumption that Miley Cyrus, Selena Gomez, Demi Lovato, etc must have had sex for their careers.

Seohyun, Jessica, Hyoyeon, Yoona, Yuri, and BoA got casted when they were in Elementary School. Sulli, Taeyeon, and Luna and got casted at a really young age, too. I’m not sure the people who held the auditions told the young girls, “You’re going to be accepted as trainees into S.M., but you have to promise to have sex with us when you turn 15.” You can see youtube videos of Yoona, Yuri, and Seohyun goofing around as elementary school kid trainees in the SM practice rooms, even talking to SuJu and DBSK members. I don’t think they were sexually traumatized elementary school kids.

Also, in large companies like SM, JYP, YG, auditions are recorded. And they have to pass the judgment of a whole PANEL of judges, some of which are FEMALE. So, it’s kind of hard to have sex with all of them in exchange for acceptance into the company.

There are so many reasons why it’s HIGHLY unlikely that female trainees didn’t have sex in order to debut. These are just a few.”

I’m not saying that SM, JYP, and YG haven’t had someone in the company do that, but I still think it’s pretty unlikely.

You cannot make assumptions from what you see on TV. Broadcasting agencies themselves have underground alliances with various entertainment companies (seriously, you shouldn’t even BEGIN to underestimate the financial and manipulative power of these bodies), and of course they’re not going to publicly release anything that would cause the slightest blow to these labels’ reputations. Auditions are recorded, yes, but where’s the proof that the dialogue (and representatives) in those recordings are legit? Again, money is power. When you are rich and influential, anything can be dreamt up and made possible.

And of course, idols who were sexually traumatized are not going to make it obvious when there are cameras around. 

Here’s another comment that sums up everything else I wish to say: 

It is very sad and unfortunate that situations like these happen all the time in so many industries but it is even more upsetting when you know the lengths of how far the industry will go to cover up the truth in order to maintain a healthy image toward the public. Young teenagers and children in the entertainment and modeling industry are always targeted and victimized because of their vulnerability and it would be nice if the government could do something about it. However, companies always hold the advantage in terms of money, influence, slander, and black mail in an attempt to discredit the victim. Also, victims are often too ashamed or frightened to reveal the truth due to fear of persecution and the possibility that no one is willing to believe them…

And to end, I agree with what other commenters have brought up: reveal the names of these companies already. So many young kids are aspiring to enter the entertainment industry more than ever, and there needs to be some kind of certified, public informant steering them in the right directions (like a UNION, maybe?!?!) 

But of course, all these things are waaaay easier said than done. Ugh, this industry needs a serious cleanse. Fast.